Friday July 30, 2010
Find local businesses. Fast!

No Stats
Local News

Anti-GAS groups get corporate grant

Mountain Equipment Co-op donates over $8,000 to help stop resort development on Brohm Ridge

A high-profile outdoor recreation outfitter has stepped into arguably the most politicized issue in Squamish by donating thousands of dollars to a coalition of local community groups opposed to the Garibaldi at Squamish (GAS) resort development.

Several local groups opposing the development of a ski and golf resort at Brohm Ridge stand to benefit from the recently awarded $8,400 sustainability grant from the Mountain Equipment Co-Op (MEC) advocacy and education program.

According to MEC representatives, the local chapter of Big Wildlife, an Oregon-based wildlife advocacy group, will receive the grant in a lump sum and is expected to complete an “awareness project” within 12 months.

"The massive Garibaldi at Squamish resort would turn a stunning, natural landscape into a sprawling development of Mcmansions with Chemlawns," stated Brian Vincent, the Squamish-based communications director Big Wildlife, in a Nov. 24 press release announcing the funding.

“By funding efforts to stop the GAS project, Mountain Equipment Co-Op has demonstrated its commitment to conserving what makes Squamish so special.”

In the release, Vincent stated the grant would help fund a public awareness campaign developed through the collaborative efforts of more than 20 groups, including the Squamish Environment Society and Save Garibaldi.

Vincent, who reportedly wrote the grant application for a project entitled “Stop Garibaldi at Squamish Ski Resort Development,” refused to speak to The Chief.

MEC does not disclose applicants’ documents, according to the company’s sustainability co-ordinator Kirsten Blomdal.

The grant, according to Blomdal, was awarded to, for a public awareness campaign on the perils of the four season resort proposed for Brohm Ridge, which would include 22,846 bed units and golf courses.

According to Blomdal, a seven-person committee approved the grant because MEC encourages the preservation of backcountry, like Brohm Ridge.

“I think that they liked the work that they [the coalition] were going to be doing and there was a very strong support for protecting the backcountry.”

Squamish Environment Society president Catherine Jackson said she’s pleased MEC has acknowledged the importance of the backcountry area.

“We’re really very grateful to MEC, for them to recognize that this is an area that has so much value in terms of recreational opportunities.”

She said the campaign is geared towards increasing community awareness through the dissemination of information, but admits no specific plans exist just yet for the funds.

“We haven’t had our meeting to say ‘OK this is definitely where the money is going to be used’ but in our application we outlined a number of different proposals, things like information sessions, leaflet design and distribution and we’ve also ear marked some money for research.”

Jackson said the coalition has scheduled to start moving ahead on the awareness campaign in the New Year.

Save Garibaldi spokesperson Jessica Reid said an awareness campaign is desperately needed because many people are either unaware or misinformed about the proposed development.

“There’s still a lot of people that don’t really know really what’s going on and don’t know why this development is so controversial.”

Reid said the lack of research and information regarding the long-term socio-economic impact a resort would have on the municipality of Squamish, is very concerning.

“They haven’t accounted for any of the services that taxpayers generally account for like policing services or public transit, for example. So that falls on our shoulders, if it doesn’t make enough money to sustain itself, it becomes a liability for Squamish.”

Representatives from Garibaldi at Squamish declined to comment or did not return phones calls. However resort proponents have an opportunity to further their agenda during the Friends of Garibaldi Christmas celebration Tuesday (Dec. 15)


[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2010 Glacier Media Inc.

Comments

JC says...

You would think the Squamish Council would take notice that MEC, a company that is supported by many local residents, is against GAS.

It is time the Council followed MEC's lead and took a strong position against this disastrous development proposal. Say no to GAS.

Posted on December 7, 2009 @ 9:15 am PST | Report post to Editor | 2990198 

Meredith says...

There are many reasons I like MEC. But the main reason is the company's vision. In addition to its dedication to producing the best quality outdoor gear on the planet, MEC supports local communities like Squamish to protect wilderness and wildlife.

Thank you, MEC, for helping our town fend off a development nightmare. The GAS plan should be scrapped forever and the area proposed for the reort should be protected.

And thanks to the groups in town that are leading the charge against GAS. Many of us here appreciate your hard work.

Posted on December 5, 2009 @ 9:50 am PST | Report post to Editor | 2985017 

Toby says...

Another reason to purchase from MEC. The company, with its commitment to conserving Canada's wild areas and recreation, is a model business. The fact MEC donated to the anti-GAS campaign shows it is willing to put its money where its mouth is.

I'm thankful MEC is supporting local efforts to defeat GAS. The proposed ski resort, one that would destroy important wildlife and fish habitat, as well as close off current recreational use, would devastate Squamish.

I know where I'll be doing most of my holiday shopping. It will be a MEC Christmas.

Posted on December 5, 2009 @ 9:32 am PST | Report post to Editor | 2985016 

Toby says...

Another reason to purchase from MEC. The company, with its commitment to conserving Canada's wild areas and recreation, is a model business. The fact MEC donated to the anti-GAS campaign shows it is willing to put its money where its mouth is.

I'm thankful MEC is supporting local efforts to defeat GAS. The proposed ski resort, one that would destroy important wildlife and fish habitat, as well as close off current recreational use, would devastate Squamish.

I know where I'll be doing most of my holiday shopping. It will be a MEC Christmas.

Posted on December 5, 2009 @ 9:32 am PST | Report post to Editor | 2985015 

HS says...

This ranks as one of the top three stories in Squamish for 2009. I'd say the contenders for top story start with the ongoing "loss" of seasoned staff at City Hall. A good question to ask of Mayor and Council might be where in the budget they are finding the funds to facilitate such exits? Second contender for top three stories might be the opening of London Drugs. The latter is a part of the legacy created by the previous administration under former Mayor Sutherland and CAO Anema. They initiated and ensured the establishment of much infrastructure and commerce flow to the north end of Howe Sound. The third contender for number one story is MEC funding the groups against GAS.

MEC is it's membership. They conduct regular online indepth surveys across Canada on all topics from ethical sourcing, education, advocacy, store layout and service to name but a few. It's annual elections are transparent and inclusive. MEC therefore is not a distant corporate entity rather it is it's membership. Not a step is taken without cross referencing through their state of the art polls to see in which direction they have a mandate to take action.

Handing over such a grant to the anti GAS groups is a microcism of Squamish taxpayer sentiment revealed. Think about it. Most in town sport MEC products and participate in the lifestyle. It's as if MEC has done what City Hall does not, ie regular polls or referendums on issues and acting accordingly. Instead this Mayor and Council cling to the old small town power paradigm of might is right regardless of community sentiment.

This reminds me of the TV show Survivor. The group has it's strategic alliances, they vote together and turf the stronger candidates off of the island. The problem is eventually they must start turning on each other as there is only one winner. MEC embraces the notion of the new power paradigm wherein choices and decisions are made ethically on the basis of the groups mission statement and adherence to such.

I'd say the big emerging story of 2010 will be the unfolding of the next episode of Mayor and Council's enactment of the Survivor format. We'll next start to see them breaking rank and turning on one another as they realize those they've voted off the island now have voting power themselves. With 2010 emerging more than one set of games is about to begin.

Posted on December 5, 2009 @ 9:02 am PST | Report post to Editor | 2985014 

Post a comment

You must be Registered and logged in to post a comment.

Register or

The Squamish Chief welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.




About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Subscribe | Sitemap / RSS    Glacier Interactive Media & their Glacier Websites    © Copyright 2010 Glacier Interactive Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?