Wednesday June 19, 2013


QUESTION OF THE WEEK

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.







Weighty issues

Editorial

The Harper Conservatives are fond of saying that Canada is “punching above our weight” on the international stage. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty famously used the phrase in a September 2010 speech to the Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP), and we’ve heard local MP John Weston and other Tories use it on numerous occasions.

It’s mostly hogwash, though. We’ll grant that they’ve done a fair job of managing the economy domestically. The fact that Canada’s banking rules were more stringent than those in most other places long before Harper took office in 2006 is at least partly responsible for that. But Harper and Flaherty deserved some credit for the fact that we’ve fared better than most other developed countries economically in the aftermath of the 2008-’09 recession.

On the international stage, though, Canada’s influence is in many ways on the wane, at least partly because Harper and his ministers seem locked into a pattern of criticizing the Europeans debt crisis on ideological terms rather than weighing into the fray and trying to be part of the solution.

Last week, Harper’s comments in the aftermath of the Greek election — made in what Globe and Mail columnist Jeffrey Simpson refers to as a “hectoring” tone — drew an icy response from Jose Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission, who stated ungrammatically but pointedly, “We are certainly not coming here to receive lessons from nobody.”

Wrote Simpson, “Where, except on the Conservative backbench, would one get someone like Pierre Pollievre, MP? He said, ‘This Prime Minister will not force hard-working Canadian taxpayers to bail out sumptuous euro welfare-state countries and the wealthy bankers that lead them.’

“Here is blind ideology blended with profound parochialism of the kind that is giving Canada a well-deserved reputation for being increasingly an outlier, except when it comes to military interventions.”

Canada used to be a key contributor to aid for Africa; this government is cutting foreign aid by $319 million this year alone. It used to be seen as a leader on the environment, but we’re now viewed as a hindrance to real action on climate change and a haven for “dirty oil” profiteers — another example of an issue on which Canada’s global influence appears to be on the wane.

— David Burke


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Squamish Chief welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus



About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Home Delivery | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?