Tuesday June 18, 2013


QUESTION OF THE WEEK

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.







Backyard chicken issue on life support

Residential ban in effect, but council may reconsider after more community dialogue
Submitted photo

Keeping chickens is currently prohibited in Squamish residential areas, but council on Sept. 4 agreed to undertake dialogue with citizens and consider bringing the issue back for another look.

Don't count your backyard chickens out until they're… well, really out.

Despite one councillor's insistence that he and colleagues should put the issue out to pasture, ban chickens in residential neighbourhoods and move on to “more important” issues, it seems the little domestic egg-laying critters just won't go away.

On July 24, Squamish councillors meeting as Committee of the Whole adopted a recommendation that local residents be allowed to keep bees, but not chickens or other “miniature” farm animals in residential areas. The key reason: chickens attract bears and perhaps cougars, leading to a higher incidence of human-wildlife conflict.

But Committee of the Whole votes are not binding, and at Tuesday's (Sept. 4) regular meeting, council voted 4-3 in favour of Coun. Patricia Heintzman's motion to not permit the keeping of backyard chickens for now but to seek more community dialogue on the issue before potentially bringing it back for another look.

“It's a public safety issue and I have to say, I'm frankly a little embarrassed that we're spending this much time on this debate,” Coun. Ron Sander said. “I, for one, would like to talk about something that's more important. Let's get on with some economic development discussion.”

Coun. Sue Chapelle disagreed.

“I do find food policy and the education of our children surrounding food an important issue. It is an important issue in my community,” she said.

Coun. Bryan Raiser made a motion to separate the issue into three separate votes: One for backyard bees, one for chickens and one to support the establishment of a bylaw encouraging the formation of a community small-livestock co-op on appropriately zoned land. That motion was defeated, with Sander, councillors Ted Prior and Doug Race and Mayor Rob Kirkham voting against.

Heintzman then put forward her motion, insisting, “When this came forward to Committee of the Whole, my gut feeling was that we needed to have a lot more community dialogue.”

Prior said that while he “would like to have chickens myself,” he's now convinced that having chickens in residential areas presents a public safety hazard. Still, he said he's still open to discussion about the potential for a co-op if it could be made secure. Prior voted with Chapelle, Heintzman and Raiser in favour of Heintzman's motion.


[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 Glacier Media Inc.

Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Squamish Chief welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus



About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Home Delivery | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?