It’s pretty clear that the dividing question for this year’s municipal election will be something along the lines of “Do you support the Woodfibre LNG plant?”
All-candidates’ meetings will not be complete until at least one polling of the candidates on this topic. And although some have come down firmly in favour and some opposed, there are a number of candidates who will see answering the question as a losing proposition. With the community so clearly split on the issue, answering “Yay” or “Nay” runs the risk of alienating half of the electorate. So what’s a candidate to do? For those unsure of how to answer that question, I’d like to offer tips on how to bafflegab or weasel-word your way out of the pesky LNG question:
(1) Point the finger elsewhere. “Passing the buck” is a tried and true technique. Municipalities say it’s a provincial affair, the province blames the feds, and on it goes. Advantages: It may be the easiest and most effective tactic because it’s probably true. Disadvantages: You may look cowardly; just because it is beyond your bailiwick doesn’t mean you can’t have an opinion.
Candidate’s script: “This decision will happen in Victoria. I commit to working hard and getting the best deal for the citizens of Squamish.
(2) The Calandra Gambit. This risky play is favoured by Federal Conservatives but is not for the faint of heart. When someone asks the question, answer with a non-sequitar. Advantages: You may find yourself on National TV. Disadvantages: You may find yourself on National TV.
Candidate’s script: “I love killer whales and dolphins, and we need to ensure that the mountain biking trails in Squamish are protected.”
(3) Keep open-minded. This play, if handled well, can add gravitas to any candidate’s campaign. Place hand on chin and nod for added effect. Advantages: You can appear diplomatic and deep-thinking. Disadvatages: It’s a small town; so many people may know that you’re not either of those things.
Candidate’s script: “I’m looking forward to learning about the project and its implications. Once I have all the information, I will make an informed decision in the best interest of the community.
(4) Playing both sides of the fence. A difficult task in this polarized debate. Advantage: If pulled off, you got it made. Disdadvantage: You run the risk of alienating everyone.
Candidate’s Script: “This town needs LNG and the jobs and money it will bring; we also need to ensure that there is no environmental impact on the town or the province.”
Good luck to all of you. I’m glad it’s not me.
