There is a proposal to rezone 1038 Finch Dr. from Rural Residential to Residential Modular Home. Twelve close neighbours have written requesting a public meeting, eight of them writing comments clearly against it. To date, well over 200 Squamish residents have signed a petition opposing it.
From a selfish and strictly financial point of view, I would be quite OK with it. The proposition itself is a good idea and according to the proponent’s plans, it would provide more affordable housing for eight families. Unfortunately, the eight families and their cars and their pets would be living a few feet away from a dog boarding facility usually accomadating 20, sometimes 30 dogs. The noise levels will be through the roof. I do strongly believe in creating affordable housing. I don’t believe in creating a slum.
This is a cherished neighbourhood. It is beautiful with a distinct and charming character. Every week I meet people from Whistler, West Vancouver and all over the Lower Mainland or beyond who previously thought of Squamish as nothing more than an exit on the way to Whistler – until they see this neighborhood and are blown away by its charm.
People from all over Squamish spend a lot of time here. This is where many keep their animals, who they often think of as members of their families. Many have friends who keep their animals here and who participate and care for them as though they were their own. Many people bike or run or hike through and enjoy the unique quality of it. The council has recently approved rezoning for a new horse facility and, if done properly, it will fit well with the rural character of the neighbourhood.
The Official Community Plan (OCP) clearly states:
“10-3 The District recognizes the importance of building a complete community and establishing Neighbourhood Centres with different characteristics, to provide a range of daily services and options for its residents… the importance of maintaining the unique qualities and characteristics of each existing neighbourhood.”
“10-7 The District will consider the preparation of Neighbourhood Plans to manage the…transition of established neighbourhoods.”
“17-4 When reviewing rezoning proposals… the District shall consider the following criteria in determining the appropriateness of the development: an appropriate transition between lower density housing, and compatibility with adjacent land uses.”
These are just a few examples of how this unplanned rezoning proposal is counter to the OCP. There are many more.
The intentions of the proponents may be good, but their proposal is full of holes as to how it will fit into this location. Additionally the council will not be making a decision on the plans of the proponents. Council is voting only on the rezoning to RMH-2, which allows for minimum 6,000 sq.ft. lots and, in this case, up to 3,300 sq.ft. houses. The public hearing will be held on March 3 at 6 p.m.
Peter Cox
Squamish
