Re: Increased user fees. The term “one taxpayer” has a fundamental meaning. For every level of government that operates or exists, the money collected (not earned) is from the same individuals. The more levels of government, the larger the strain on the individual to share the money they earn.
Also with every tax, utility charge or fee increase, the individual feels the strain of financial pressure.
Individuals and families must manage their finances carefully. Yet it seems when governments overspend, waste or manage revenue collected from the “one taxpayer,” they assume that extra downward pressure is acceptable on taxpayers.
One can use the term user fee, processing fee, service charge, sliding scale, toll, bill or invoice. But they are all taxes on the public when applied by any government.
To increase or add fees to recreational services that are used by youth, seniors and families is to deter health and well-being. There are many long-term benefits to a community that is active and engaged.
There are other options and models that can increase funding for these amenities. It is not the responsibility of the “one taxpayer” to pay more, rather those hired, employed and elected to find a better solution.
When for-profit companies and event organizers use community-built amenities, they should be charged the fee rather than those that have been paying already. Why not a $10-per-person event fee? This way, the funds generated could go directly back into community amenities and services.
Otherwise, if taxes and fees continue to increase, we will price half the community out of the community.
Rob Weys
Squamish
